Brownian Motions Example: Particle Dispersion and Deposition in a Viscous Sublayer (page 2 of 2)
Ounis et la. (1991) performed a series of Lagrangian simulation studies for
dispersion and deposition of particles emitted from a point source in the viscous
sublayer of a turbulent near wall flow. Figures 5, 6 and 7 show time variation
of particle trajectory statistics for different diameters, for the case that the
point source is at a distance of 0.5 wall units away from the wall.
In these simulation it is assumed that when particles touch the wall they will stick to it.
At every time step, the particle ordinates are statistically analyzed and the mean,
standard deviation and the sample minimum and maximum were evaluated.
The points that the minimum curve touches the wall identify the locations
of a deposited particle.
Figure 5 shows that 0.05 particles
have a narrow distribution and in the duration of 40 wall units none of
these particle are deposited on the wall. As the particle diameter
becomes smaller, their spreading due to Brownian diffusion increases and a
number of particles reach the wall. For example, Figure s 6 shows that
five 0.03 particles are deposited
on the wall in the duration of 40 wall units, while Figure 7 indicates
that 190 0.01 particles
(out a sample of 500 particles) are deposited on the wall.
Figures 5-7 further show that the Brownian diffusion of particles is strongly
affected by their size. This is because the power spectral intensity of
Brownian force in inversely proportional to the square of diameter.
Figure 5. Simulated trajectory statistics for 0.05
particles.
Figure 6. Simulated trajectory statistics for
0.03 particles.
Figure 7. Simulated trajectory statistics for 0.01
particles.
Figure 8 shows variations of the number of deposited particles,
, with time for a point
source at a distance of wall
units from the wall. The solid lines in this figure are the exact solution for a
diffusion model given as
|
30)
|
It is seen that the Brownian dynamic simulation results and the diffusion
equation analysis are in good agreement for the range of particle diameters studied.
Figure 8 also shows that as the particle diameter decreases, the number of deposited
particles increases sharply. Additional results (not shown here) indicate that
the deposition rate decreases as the distance of source from the wall increases.
Figures 4-8 show that the Brownian motion process is a significant mechanism for
nano-particle diffusion and wall deposition.
|
(30)
| Figure 8. Comparison of the simulated number of
deposited particles with the diffusion model given by Equation (30).
|