Clarkson University
The CAMP building
Of Interest
CRCD Home
ME 537 Home
Syllabus
Assignments
Downloads
Site Map
Course Notes
Engineering Mathematics
Review of Viscous Flows
Review of Computational Fluid Mechanics

Particle Adhesion
Simulation Methods
Experimental Techniques
Applications
Search Powered by Google

The National Science Foundation
ME 537 The National Science Foundation
 Aerosols
Introduction to Aerosols | Drag, Lift Forces | Aerosol Kinetics | Virtual Mass, Basset Forces & BBO Equation | Nonspherical Particles | Brownian Motions | Particle Deposition Mechanisms | Electrodynamics | Aerosol Coagulation |

Brownian Motions

Example: Particle Dispersion and Deposition in a Viscous Sublayer (page 2 of 2)

Ounis et la. (1991) performed a series of Lagrangian simulation studies for dispersion and deposition of particles emitted from a point source in the viscous sublayer of a turbulent near wall flow. Figures 5, 6 and 7 show time variation of particle trajectory statistics for different diameters, for the case that the point source is at a distance of 0.5 wall units away from the wall. In these simulation it is assumed that when particles touch the wall they will stick to it. At every time step, the particle ordinates are statistically analyzed and the mean, standard deviation and the sample minimum and maximum were evaluated. The points that the minimum curve touches the wall identify the locations of a deposited particle. Figure 5 shows that 0.05   particles have a narrow distribution and in the duration of 40 wall units none of these particle are deposited on the wall. As the particle diameter becomes smaller, their spreading due to Brownian diffusion increases and a number of particles reach the wall. For example, Figure s 6 shows that five 0.03   particles are deposited on the wall in the duration of 40 wall units, while Figure 7 indicates that 190 0.01   particles (out a sample of 500 particles) are deposited on the wall. Figures 5-7 further show that the Brownian diffusion of particles is strongly affected by their size. This is because the power spectral intensity of Brownian force in inversely proportional to the square of diameter.

Figure 5. Simulated trajectory statistics for 0.05 particles.

Figure 6. Simulated trajectory statistics for 0.03   particles.

Figure 7. Simulated trajectory statistics for 0.01   particles.

Figure 8 shows variations of the number of deposited particles, , with time for a point source at a distance of   wall units from the wall. The solid lines in this figure are the exact solution for a diffusion model given as

30)

It is seen that the Brownian dynamic simulation results and the diffusion equation analysis are in good agreement for the range of particle diameters studied. Figure 8 also shows that as the particle diameter decreases, the number of deposited particles increases sharply. Additional results (not shown here) indicate that the deposition rate decreases as the distance of source from the wall increases. Figures 4-8 show that the Brownian motion process is a significant mechanism for nano-particle diffusion and wall deposition.

(30)

 Figure 8. Comparison of the simulated number of deposited particles with the diffusion model given by Equation (30).



Dr. Goodarz Ahmadi | Turbulence & Multiphase Fluid Flow Laboratory | Department of Mechanical & Aeronautical Engineering
Copyright © 2002-2005 Dr. Goodarz Ahmadi. All rights reserved.
Potsdam, New York, 13699
ahmadi@clarkson.edu